Forensic "Securitization" Auditing, Chain of Title Analysis, Legal Support Services, Bonded & Insured
(406) 328-4075

Paatalo testimony in Javehari V. JPMorgan Chase

For clarification purposes:
There are two different Javehari cases. BPIA did not assist in the first case in which the trust data proved to be inaccurate.

Javaheri v Chase Opposition to SJDeclaration of William J Paatalo – Javaheri v JPMorgan Chase

One Responseto “Paatalo testimony in Javehari V. JPMorgan Chase”

  1. BPIA says:

    The Bloomberg evidence shows that the loan balance was decreasing during the time period where the borrower allegedly was not making payments. The certificateholders (beneficiary)were receiving payments regardless. If you had a rich uncle that was sending in your payment every month, can the so-called lender still foreclose because the payment wasn’t coming from the named party on the Note? I think not!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>